Wesley's Choice — Recommitment Under Fire
Plot Beats
The narrative micro-steps within this event
Wesley blurts defeat—“We don't have a prayer”—and morale dips hard.
Riker tests Wesley’s resolve by offering a transfer back to the Enterprise; Wesley snaps a firm refusal, recommitting on the spot.
Riker resets the mission ethos—improvise and value the effort—and Geordi’s playful glance signals the lesson lands, steadying morale.
Who Was There
Characters present in this moment
Surface helplessness rapidly giving way to resolute pride — frightened by the technical reality but committed to proving himself through action.
Wesley vocalizes immediate despair — 'We don't have a prayer' — then quickly refuses Riker's offer to transfer, signaling a mix of helplessness and stubborn determination to stay and help despite the odds.
- • Avoid being evacuated; remain with the Hathaway to contribute.
- • Learn and grow by participating in a genuine crisis rather than taking the safe option.
- • Honor the trust placed in him by staying despite low odds.
- • Personal growth and duty require facing failure, not fleeing it.
- • Even unlikely efforts have moral and educational value.
- • Leaving now would be a betrayal of the crew and the exercise's purpose.
Thoughtful and quietly authoritative — outwardly composed, protecting his crew's morale while weighing practical options.
Riker asks probing tactical questions, offers Wesley an evacuation to the Enterprise, then deliberately reframes the setback as an improvisation exercise, using calm paternal authority to steady morale and redirect focus from impossibility to effort.
- • Establish the technical reality of the Hathaway's propulsion and available options.
- • Protect crew welfare by offering evacuation if needed.
- • Maintain morale and convert despair into constructive action through reframing.
- • Clear information and calm leadership prevent panic and poor decisions.
- • Effort and improvisation are valuable even without guaranteed success.
- • A captain must offer both practical choices and moral guidance to sustain a crew.
Professionally concerned and resigned — prioritizes accuracy over optimism while conveying the limits of current resources.
Geordi delivers a concise technical diagnosis from engineering: the dilithium is reduced to minute fragments and there is no antimatter, answering Riker's questions without hedging and signaling the genuine severity of the propulsion failure.
- • Communicate an accurate engineering assessment to command.
- • Prevent false hope by clearly stating technical limitations.
- • Support command decisions with factual information so appropriate choices can be made.
- • Technical truth must guide tactical choices.
- • Downplaying facts endangers crews and squanders resources.
- • Engineering constraints are often binary: certain failures preclude certain solutions.
Objects Involved
Significant items in this scene
The holding clamps are referenced as the immediate locus where dilithium fragments remain; they provide a tactile image of engine damage and serve as physical proof underpinning Geordi's diagnosis and the hopelessness Wesley initially expresses.
The shattered dilithium fragments are cited as the concrete technical limitation that makes warp impossible; they function narratively as incontrovertible evidence of mechanical failure and a catalyst for the moral choice to improvise.
The Hathaway's warp drive is the absent-but-implied objective: its silence and lack of antimatter flow are the unstated antagonist of the scene, shaping dialogue and commanding the tactical and emotional stakes.
Narrative Connections
How this event relates to others in the story
No narrative connections mapped yet
This event is currently isolated in the narrative graph
Key Dialogue
"WESLEY: "We don't have a prayer.""
"RIKER: "Would you care to transfer back to the Enterprise, Mister Crusher?""
"RIKER: "Remember Wes, the purpose here is to improvise. It's the effort that counts.""