Proposed Triumvirate Government (Barrass-Napoleon Conspiracy)
Coup-Driven Transitional Consular GovernmentDescription
Event Involvements
Events with structured involvement data
The proposed triumvirate government is the central focus of Barrass’s negotiation with Napoleon, serving as the blueprint for the post-Robespierre political order. Barrass outlines the constitutional amendment that would establish this new structure, positioning Napoleon as one of three consuls. The organization’s formation is contingent on the coup’s success, with its legitimacy hinging on Napoleon’s acceptance and the army’s support. The conversation reveals the triumvirate’s potential to consolidate power and rewrite the constitution, reflecting Barrass’s ambition to reshape France’s governance.
Through Barrass’s detailed proposal and Napoleon’s conditional acceptance of the consul position.
Emerging as a contested but aspirational power structure, with Barrass and Napoleon vying for influence within its framework.
The proposed triumvirate represents a shift from revolutionary idealism to pragmatic governance, with Napoleon’s inclusion signaling the militarization of political power.
Tensions between Barrass’s political ambitions and Napoleon’s military aspirations, with the potential for factional struggles within the new government.
The proposed triumvirate government is the specter of a future France, hanging in the balance of this negotiation. Barrass outlines it as a constitutional amendment—a three-man consulship where Napoleon would hold equal power with himself and an unnamed third. The organization doesn’t yet exist, but its potential is the carrot dangled before Napoleon: a share in the reins of power, a chance to shape France’s destiny. The discussion of its structure (constitutional rights, amendments) reveals Barrass’s intent to legitimize the coup through institutional reform, not just brute force. Yet the triumvirate is also a fragile construct, dependent on Robespierre’s fall and Napoleon’s compliance.
Through Barrass’s detailed proposal and Napoleon’s probing questions about its feasibility and his role within it.
Emergent and contested—Barrass seeks to establish it as the successor to Robespierre’s regime, but its viability depends on Napoleon’s acceptance and the army’s backing.
Represents a shift from revolutionary chaos to structured (if authoritarian) governance, with Napoleon as the linchpin between military and political power.
None yet—it’s a theoretical construct, but the negotiation hints at potential power struggles between the three consuls once established.
The proposed triumvirate government is the centerpiece of Barrass’s pitch, a constitutional amendment designed to replace Robespierre’s regime. He frames it as a solution to France’s instability, with Napoleon as a key consul to lend legitimacy. The organization’s structure is still theoretical, but its potential power is undeniable—it represents a shift from radical ideology to pragmatic governance, with Napoleon’s military influence as its anchor. The coup’s success hinges on establishing this government, and its failure would leave a power vacuum.
Through Barrass’s constitutional arguments and Napoleon’s conditional acceptance, the triumvirate is positioned as the Revolution’s future.
Being challenged by Robespierre’s regime but poised to replace it, with Napoleon’s military power as its primary enforcer.
The triumvirate’s establishment would mark a turning point in the Revolution, shifting power from ideological purges to military and political pragmatism.
Potential factional disputes among the consuls, but Barrass assumes Napoleon’s ambition will align with his own goals.
The New Government Proposed by Barrass and Napoleon is discussed as the potential outcome of the conspiracy to overthrow Robespierre. The group’s debate about its implications—‘He won’t be content with that’ (Stirling on Napoleon)—highlights the organization’s role as a looming political force. While not yet formed, its proposed structure (a three-consul government with Napoleon as a key figure) is treated as an inevitable development, shaping the group’s concerns about France’s future. The organization’s influence is felt indirectly, as the group grapples with the moral and practical consequences of its rise. Stirling’s surprise at Barrass’s strength suggests that the proposed government could become a reality sooner than expected, adding urgency to their mission.
Through the discussion of its proposed structure and the implications of Napoleon’s involvement, as well as the group’s concerns about its potential impact.
Emerging as a rival to Robespierre’s regime, with the potential to reshape France’s political landscape. Its power is growing but not yet consolidated, making it a wildcard in the revolution’s outcome.
The proposed government’s rise would mark a shift from revolutionary idealism to pragmatic authoritarianism, with Napoleon’s ambition as a wild card. The group’s involvement in monitoring its formation underscores the broader stakes of their mission: navigating a political landscape where every faction is a potential threat or ally.
Tensions may emerge between Barrass and Napoleon as they vie for control within the new government, but their immediate goal is unity against Robespierre.