Replicative Fading and the Demand for DNA
Plot Beats
The narrative micro-steps within this event
Pulaski presses on how they smothered sexual drive; Granger admits early drugs and punitive laws and now finds natural reproduction repugnant. Picard tags the cost—“a culture with no children”—as Granger touts accelerated clone growth and imprinted learning.
Pulaski targets the core pathology—replicative fading—and Granger concedes they never solved it. She breaks down copy-of-a-copy chromosome errors while Granger calls out a creeping mental sclerosis, escalating the threat from technical to existential.
Who Was There
Characters present in this moment
Pragmatic concern; a professional alarm tinged with empathy for the colony's plight but firm in medical ethics.
Acts as the clinical authority: carries a tricorder, names and explains 'replicative fading', warns that technical repairs won't stop the colony's biological decline, and refuses to endorse cloning as a morally or medically acceptable remedy.
- • Diagnose and clearly communicate the medical reality (replicative fading).
- • Prevent unethical medical practices (cloning Enterprise crew without real consent).
- • Medical intervention must respect individual autonomy and bioethical standards.
- • Cloning as a long-term solution is scientifically and morally unsound given replicative fading.
Portrayed as vulnerable and diminishing; their collective condition evokes pity and urgency but also raises ethical complexity about individual worth versus communal survival.
Referenced but not physically present; depicted as the homogeneous, declining population whose replicative fading and mental sclerosis provide the moral urgency and human stakes of the scene.
- • (As a collective condition) Survive and maintain social function.
- • Maintain social cohesion through available cultural practices (cloning).
- • Survival of the group is paramount.
- • Cloning is the society's accepted means of continuity despite long-term costs.
Frantic urgency mixed with a brittle politeness; pleading for a choice that will keep his people alive, even at great moral cost.
Speaks from desperation and political responsibility: recounts Mariposa's founding by five survivors, admits the colony's cloning dependence and failure to solve replicative fading, and pleads for Enterprise DNA while accepting repair assistance if DNA is refused.
- • Obtain fresh genetic material to prevent colony-wide collapse.
- • Secure immediate technical aid to buy time for his people.
- • The survival of his population justifies extraordinary measures, including requesting external DNA.
- • Traditional reproduction is not an available or acceptable cultural option for Mariposa anymore.
Calm and principled on the surface; concerned about the colony's fate while steadfastly protective of individual rights.
Leads the meeting with measured authority, listens to Granger's account, refuses to permit crew DNA donation on ethical grounds, and immediately converts refusal into a practical commitment to send repair teams.
- • Protect Enterprise crew members from being treated as genetic resources.
- • Provide aid within ethical constraints (authorize repair teams).
- • Individuals' bodily autonomy must not be subordinated to utilitarian survival.
- • Starfleet's duty is to aid but not to compromise its ethical standards.
Defensive and resolute; offended by the notion of commodification yet professional and ready to act to help in other ways.
Responds viscerally and personally to the cloning request, rejecting the idea of being duplicated; supports operational response by agreeing to form and lead repair/away teams when ordered.
- • Refuse participation in cloning or DNA donation.
- • Ensure practical solutions are deployed (assemble away teams to repair equipment).
- • Personal identity cannot be preserved by cloning alone; human continuity comes through natural reproduction.
- • Starfleet officers should not be treated as biological resources without consent.
Unified protective stance and moral clarity; compassionate but unwilling to violate personal autonomy for utilitarian aims.
Represented through Picard, Riker and Pulaski: the crew collectively refuses to be treated as genetic stock, accepts practical technical assistance roles, and embodies Starfleet ethical standards.
- • Protect individual crew members from nonconsensual use of biological material.
- • Provide non‑invasive aid (technical repairs, teams) consistent with Starfleet principles.
- • Starfleet's aid must not override personal rights.
- • There are ethical limits to assistance even in life‑or‑death situations.
Objects Involved
Significant items in this scene
Pulaski's medical tricorder rests in her lap and symbolizes clinical authority; its presence underscores her role in diagnosing 'replicative fading' and lends scientific weight to her warnings against cloning as a solution.
The coffee service sits on Granger's desk as formal hospitality set dressing. It underscores the ceremonial but strained nature of the meeting, offering an uneasy veneer of normalcy while desperate negotiations unfold.
Individual glasses are held by participants during the meeting, acting as small protective props—Riker's glass punctuates his personal refusal and helps stage his emotional reaction to the cloning request.
Location Details
Places and their significance in this event
Prime Minister Granger's executive office functions as the formal negotiation chamber where hospitality and political pressure collide. The room frames the exchange as official, intimate, and high‑stakes: convivial details (coffee service, glasses) sit against the urgent ethical plea for survival.
Narrative Connections
How this event relates to others in the story
"After Riker refuses DNA donation, Mariposan clones abduct him and Pulaski to harvest tissue without consent."
"Diagnosing replicative fading logically leads Pulaski to reject cloning as a fix and propose natural reproduction instead."
"Diagnosing replicative fading logically leads Pulaski to reject cloning as a fix and propose natural reproduction instead."
"Pulaski’s diagnosis of replicative fading escalates to the hard timeline of two to three generations before collapse."
"Pulaski’s diagnosis of replicative fading escalates to the hard timeline of two to three generations before collapse."
"Mariposa’s suppression of sexuality is thematically reversed by Pulaski’s plan that mandates robust sexual reproduction to restore genetic diversity."
"Mariposa’s suppression of sexuality is thematically reversed by Pulaski’s plan that mandates robust sexual reproduction to restore genetic diversity."
"Mariposa’s suppression of sexuality is thematically reversed by Pulaski’s plan that mandates robust sexual reproduction to restore genetic diversity."
Themes This Exemplifies
Thematic resonance and meaning
Key Dialogue
"PULASKI: Each time you clone you're making a copy of a copy. Subtle errors creep into the chromosomes, and eventually you end up with a non-viable clone."
"GRANGER: We need an infusion of fresh DNA. I was hoping that you would be willing to share tissue samples from your crew."
"RIKER: No way. Not me. GRANGER: How can you possibly be harmed? RIKER: It's not a question of harm. A single William Riker is unique, maybe even special. Hundreds or thousands of them diminish me in a way I can't explain."