Interrogating the Defector: Proof vs. Plea
Plot Beats
The narrative micro-steps within this event
Riker challenges Setal's lack of physical evidence about the secret base on Nelvana Three, questioning the logistics of his escape.
Setal defends his story, detailing the massive files he saw and explaining the difficulties of bringing physical evidence.
Riker questions Setal's piloting skills, casting further doubt on the plausibility of his escape.
Who Was There
Characters present in this moment
Increasingly agitated and pleading; alternates between composed testimony and righteous indignation as he attempts to convert skepticism into belief.
Setal sits on the platform, answers Riker's factual probes while correcting a planted sector misname, insists he observed large classified files, explains a hurried one-man escape, then moves from measured explanation into passionate pleas while gesturing for understanding.
- • Convince Starfleet to accept his intelligence and act on it
- • Secure asylum and ensure his sacrifice is not wasted
- • Win trust by appealing to shared humanity
- • Deflect accusations of opportunism or deceit
- • The intelligence he carries is vital and true
- • Romulan secrecy prevents physical proof from being removed
- • Sacrifice carries moral weight that should compel action
- • Appealing to common good can override institutional animosity
Clinically skeptical with controlled impatience; his surface authority masks concern about being manipulated into an escalatory response.
Riker stands on the raised platform and runs the interrogation with procedural rigor, consulting his PADD, correcting Setal on details, pressing for physical evidence, and openly doubting the plausibility of the Romulan's escape story.
- • Establish the factual veracity of Setal's claims
- • Obtain physical evidence or verifiable corroboration
- • Protect the ship and crew from a provocation
- • Prevent acting on unverified intelligence that could start a war
- • Unverified testimony cannot justify operational action
- • Romulan defections may be deception or deliberate provocation
- • Procedural verification is the duty of command
- • Moral rhetoric must be translated into forensic proof
Calm and inquisitive; professionally detached but searching for emotional cues that will inform command judgment.
Troi sits beside Riker, offering a calm, focused question about Setal's personal motives; she listens for emotional truth and attempts to reveal underlying stake and sincerity while allowing Riker to lead the factual interrogation.
- • Clarify Setal's personal motivations
- • Detect emotional coherence or deception
- • Protect moral integrity in the decision to act
- • Bridge humanitarian impulse and operational caution
- • Motives reveal credibility as much as facts do
- • Emotional honesty can be detected and is meaningful to command decisions
- • Compassion should inform but not override operational security
- • Interpersonal understanding can prevent escalation
Objects Involved
Significant items in this scene
Riker consults a PADD as a procedural anchor: he reads and corrects details (sector number), uses it to structure questions, and it functions as the tangible record that frames his interrogation and prompts Setal's correction.
A voluminous dossier of transport and construction records is verbally referenced as 'massive files' that would corroborate Setal; Riker explicitly demands their production, making the dossier the contested MacGuffin that will determine operational credibility.
The claimed bundle of intelligence — transport schedules, troop movements, construction reports — is repeatedly invoked by Setal as the factual basis for his warning but is not produced; its absence converts the interrogation into a battle over proof versus rhetoric.
Location Details
Places and their significance in this event
The raised platform in the debriefing room operates as a small, clinical stage that centralizes attention on Setal's testimony; its lighting and arrangement turn interrogation into performance and force moral and factual choices into a public, recorded spectacle.
Sector Eight-One-Four is invoked as a precise coordinate to test Setal's knowledge; Riker uses the sector designation as a forensic lever, and Setal's quick correction shows both awareness and the interrogator's strategy to fracture narrative evasions.
Nelvana Three is invoked as the putative site of the Romulan base Setal claims to have seen; its sterility on sensors and Setal's admission of never setting foot there make the planet itself an object of contested inference rather than direct evidence.
Narrative Connections
How this event relates to others in the story
No narrative connections mapped yet
This event is currently isolated in the narrative graph
Key Dialogue
"RIKER: "You've never actually stepped foot on Nelvana Three.""
"RIKER: "And where are they? All these files? Why not bring the files to prove what you're saying?""
"SETAL: "Then do as I ask! I know how difficult it is for you to believe me. I feel the same suspicions toward you. But we must look beyond our long-standing animosity and work toward the good of both our people.""