Bartlet Probes Therapist on Moral Crimes, Hints at Assassination
Plot Beats
The narrative micro-steps within this event
Bartlet discusses Shakespeare's 'The War of the Roses' with Stanley, hinting at his internal conflict through the mention of a song about war and peace.
Bartlet shifts the conversation to a hypothetical crime, probing Stanley about moral and legal boundaries, revealing his torment over an impending decision.
Bartlet cryptically admits he can't disclose his intentions due to security and legal implications, leaving Stanley with unspoken concerns as he exits.
Who Was There
Characters present in this moment
Intellectually feigned casualness veiling profound moral torment and anticipatory dread
Reclined in session, Bartlet nostalgically recounts Shakespearean musical and Edwardian song, pivots to hypothetical on justifiable crimes via Connecticut contraceptive law example, pauses reflectively, sighs heavily while deflecting probes, stands abruptly, grabs jacket, and exits the study, signaling inner rupture.
- • Gauge therapist's tolerance for moral relativism to rationalize assassination
- • Vent torment indirectly without breaching security or triggering reporting
- • Greater good justifies civil disobedience against unjust laws
- • Presidential burdens demand secrecy even from confidants like therapists
Professionally curious with underlying concern for patient's veiled distress
Conducting session from couch, Stanley inquires on sleep, responds to musical reverie, offers parking quip to crime hypothetical, expresses genuine surprise at Connecticut law, persistently questions Bartlet's mind, absorbs deflections calmly as president exits abruptly.
- • Uncover root of president's insomnia and distraction through open dialogue
- • Build trust to elicit honest revelation of underlying psychological burden
- • Therapeutic candor heals even elite vulnerabilities
- • Hypotheticals reveal true preoccupations worth pursuing
Location Details
Places and their significance in this event
The private study hosts the confidential therapy duel, its heavy doors sealing Bartlet and Stanley in daylight-lit intimacy where nostalgic diversions yield to moral hypotheticals, culminating in presidential flight—amplifying isolation of command's ethical weight amid White House frenzy.
Narrative Connections
How this event relates to others in the story
"Bartlet's therapy session about a hypothetical crime thematically parallels his real-world decision to authorize Shareef's assassination."
"Bartlet's internal conflict about crime and morality is mirrored in his confrontation with Ritchie over the dismissive comment about Simon's death."
"Bartlet's internal conflict about crime and morality is mirrored in his confrontation with Ritchie over the dismissive comment about Simon's death."
Key Dialogue
"BARTLET: "Let me ask you something. Is there a crime, which if it wasn't illegal, you would do?""
"STANLEY: "I'd park anywhere I want." BARTLET: "Right, but you wouldn't rob a bank?""
"BARTLET: "If I tell you I intend to commit a crime, you're required by law to report it. [beat] I have a strange meeting coming up.""