Bartlet Tests Vengeance
Plot Beats
The narrative micro-steps within this event
Bartlet requests Father Cavanaugh's presence, signaling his turn toward spiritual counsel.
Bartlet presses Charlie on vengeance versus justice by asking if he'd want his mother's killer executed, exposing raw emotional tectonics.
Charlie's response—'I'd wanna do it myself'—reveals the human thirst for vengeance beneath political abstractions.
Who Was There
Characters present in this moment
Haunted and solemn; his surface calm masks deep personal pain and a private, vengeful impulse.
Charlie Young enters, listens, and is directly addressed by the President; he receives Bartlet's probing about the man who shot his mother and answers with restrained honesty that he would not want the state to execute the killer but would do it himself.
- • To fulfill his duty as the President's aide without letting personal trauma override professional comportment
- • To be honest when directly asked, even if the truth is uncomfortable
- • The machinery of the state is not the same as personal justice
- • Some personal wounds remain outside legal closure and carry urges the law cannot contain
Controlled, probing — outwardly wry but inwardly unsettled; seeking certainty and moral counsel beneath political responsibility.
President Josiah 'Jed' Bartlet is dressing while listening and directing the moral frame: he converts a legal briefing into a spiritual question, requests a priest and jokes about the Pope, then physically approaches Charlie to ask a piercing, personal hypothetical.
- • To move the discussion from technical legal options into a moral/spiritual register
- • To test the private convictions of a direct subordinate (Charlie) in order to clarify his own conscience
- • Moral decisions can require counsel and prayer beyond legal advice
- • Personal testimony (like Charlie's) will reveal the human cost that should inform presidential action
Businesslike and slightly weary; he frames urgency practically and defers the existential weighing to the President.
Leo McGarry delivers a concise legal summary of the case, outlines the briefing timeline, and then exits — performing his role as crisis manager and leaving the President to the moral work he has initiated.
- • To present the legal facts and set a timeline for a formal briefing
- • To maintain operational control and ensure the President has the necessary materials
- • Complex moral questions require a separate deliberative process from legal briefings
- • The Presidency functions best when procedural clarity precedes political or pastoral decisions
Location Details
Places and their significance in this event
The President's bedroom is the intimate setting where a formal legal briefing becomes a confessional exchange. Its private domestic details allow Bartlet to move from policy to personal questioning, providing a contained space for moral reckoning without public theater.
The White House functions as the institutional frame for the exchange: the President's private room sits inside a larger machine of governance and protocol, emphasizing that private moral choices have public consequences and must be reconciled with administrative procedures.
Michigan is invoked as the jurisdictional origin of the case and as a contrast to federal authority; its mention locates the conviction and political stakeholders (the governor) outside Washington and thereby complicates executive culpability.
Hanover is referenced as the home of Father Cavanaugh; its mention imports a small-town, parish-rooted moral authority into the President's urban, institutional world and serves as the source for sacramental counsel Bartlet seeks.
The Immaculate Heart of Mary Church is the named parish where Father Thomas Cavanaugh serves; it is narratively invoked to supply pastoral help and moral perspective for the President's decision-making.
The District Court in Michigan is invoked as the trial venue that produced the conviction; its procedural existence supplies the legal anchor for Leo's briefing and the president's looming decision.
Narrative Connections
How this event relates to others in the story
"Bartlet's probing question to Charlie about vengeance versus justice foreshadows his own spiritual reckoning with Father Cavanaugh's parable."
"Bartlet's probing question to Charlie about vengeance versus justice foreshadows his own spiritual reckoning with Father Cavanaugh's parable."
"Leo's briefing to Bartlet about the Supreme Court's decision directly leads to Bartlet's later confession of his failed search for legal loopholes."
"Leo's briefing to Bartlet about the Supreme Court's decision directly leads to Bartlet's later confession of his failed search for legal loopholes."
Key Dialogue
"BARTLET: "I'm gonna want to talk to the Pope.""
"BARTLET: "If they did, would you wanna see him executed?" CHARLIE: "I wouldn't want to see him executed, Mr. President -- I'd wanna do it myself.""