Joe Quincy's Security Vetting Questionnaire (Question 75)

Joe Quincy confronts his lie on question 75 of his White House security questionnaire during a tense hallway exchange with Josh outside the Roosevelt Room. He admits concealing his failure to vote for President Bartlet, an omission tied to actions reflecting poorly on the administration. Josh, Donna, Stanley, and Leo witness the confession, which underscores Joe's Republican past and frozen party status after a Solicitor General memo.

2 appearances

Purpose

Screen nominees for security clearance by identifying actions, affiliations, or omissions that could embarrass or undermine the President

Significance

Triggers Joe's full disclosure of partisan disloyalty and non-vote for Bartlet, forcing Josh to weigh competence against ideological purity amid post-shooting scrutiny and recommend him to Leo anyway

Appearances in the Narrative

When this object appears and how it's used

2 moments

S4E20 · Evidence of Things Not Seen

Josh Confronts Donna — Then Unmasks Joe's Politics

Question 75 from the security questionnaire operates as a targeted accusatory device. When Josh presses, Joe admits he lied about having done anything that would reflect poorly on the President — specifically not voting for him — which reframes loyalty concerns.

Before: Answered falsely by Joe (unspecified on the physical form) and unsigned; latent risk.

After: The lie is exposed; the question becomes the explicit record of compromise and a test of Joe's motives.

View full event

S4E20 · Evidence of Things Not Seen

Republican Confession, Pragmatic Recommendation

Question 75 on the security questionnaire functions as the specific factual pivot: Josh identifies it and Joe admits he lied about anything that would reflect poorly on the President — namely, that he didn't vote for Bartlet. The item transforms private political choice into an explicit institutional risk.

Before: Unanswered or falsely answered on Joe's form; contained as part of the SF-86.

After: Content of the question is verbally contradicted by Joe's admission; what was hidden is now exposed, creating an immediate clearance and trust issue.

View full event