Committee to Re-Elect
Description
Event Involvements
Events with structured involvement data
The Committee to Re-Elect is personified by Bruno and drives the imperative to assess political fallout from the bombing and related legal flashpoints; it represents campaign priorities that push for risk-minimization and message discipline.
Through Bruno Gianelli's interventions and prioritization of campaign triage and messaging.
Operates alongside White House staff, often pushing for electoral-minded decisions that can clash with policy or moral immediacies.
Injects electoral calculus into crisis response, illustrating the tension between governing and campaigning during emergencies.
Operates with a command-oriented approach; prefers triage and prioritization which can create friction with policy staff who value principle over optics.
The Committee to Re-Elect is present via Bruno, whose pragmatic calculus and offhand remarks shape priorities; the organization’s goals inform his dismissive triage and interest in debate inclusion dynamics.
Through Bruno Gianelli, the Committee's general chairman on-scene.
Influential within campaign decision-making but subordinate to presidential authority; exerts pressure on messaging and priority-setting.
Frames campaign triage choices, privileging electoral calculus over human elements; exemplifies how campaign apparatus can shape crisis response.
Tension between wanting to capitalize on news cycles and avoiding opportunism; Bruno's indifference reflects triage culture.
The Committee to Re-Elect is referenced indirectly as an entity the Senator might feel pressure to shield; Susan accuses others of protecting it, making the committee an implied stakeholder whose optics and electoral interests shape advisors' calculations.
Referenced via Susan's accusation rather than represented by a person in the room.
Implicitly powerful; perceived as an actor that can direct or constrain Stackhouse's public posture and that the Senator's team might feel obligated to safeguard.
Its perceived needs shape private debate, revealing how re-election machinery can curtail independent issue advocacy by allied politicians.
Implicit tension between protecting the top of the ticket and allowing allied figures to pursue separate issue agendas.
The Committee to Re-Elect is invoked implicitly as a stakeholder whose optics and electoral interests would be affected by any public response; Susan complains about 'protecting' them, making the Committee an offstage power whose needs partially drive caution.
Represented indirectly via Susan's complaint and the room's calculation about political consequences.
Exerts indirect pressure on Stackhouse's choices by shaping what is politically safe; the committee's electoral priorities constrain independent messaging.
Represents institutionalized electoral interests that push independent actors toward caution, illustrating how campaigns and administrations indirectly shape issue debate.
Not explicitly shown here, but implied tension between aggressive issue framing and desire to avoid manufactured controversies.
Related Events
Events mentioning this organization
In the Roosevelt Room the meeting opens as light banter peels back into hard politics: Toby and staff bring the hulking Appropriations Bill while Mandy …
Moments after Leo brings the good news that the census amendment will be left in committee and the Appropriations bill is safe, the triumph collapses …
In the Northwest Lobby Josh and Donna quietly interrogate the mechanics and moral danger of Congressman Lillienfield’s leak — Josh explains the oversight committee’s dangerous …
Josh takes the stage in a university lecture hall and reframes the episode as a cautionary, self‑deprecating lecture: there is no "typical" White House day. …
Onstage at a public lecture, Josh converts crisis-control into confessional theater. Prompted by Nessler, he recounts a tight, chaotic 36-hour period that started as an …
In Josh's office a bitter, moral fight softens into a practical negotiating hinge. Jeff presses the ethical case for massive reparations, invoking historical injustice; Josh …
In a chaotic Oval Office briefing, Sam, Josh, and C.J. rapidly outline a intricate Senate committee reshuffle to slot incoming opponent Mitchell onto Foreign Relations, …
In the Oval Office, amid frenetic staff briefings on Senate committee shuffles to block Mitchell, Toby reports unanimous liaison advice to call a lame duck …
Fresh from fury over Ellie's defiance, President Bartlet shifts to Josh's briefing on the Surgeon General's fallout: fierce opposition from Judiciary, Oversight, and Appropriations committees …
Outside a D.C. building, Josh and Senator Ritter briefly marvel at the Haitian crisis's surreal escalation—the president-elect smuggled into the U.S. embassy in a car …
Josh bursts into CJ's office to brief her on the Justice Department's tobacco lawsuit facing a massive funding shortfall and two Democratic defections on the …
In the aftermath of a fractious strategy meeting, Bruno pulls Josh into the hallway en route to his office, bluntly confronting him for prematurely sending …
Leo enters Margaret's office post her tense exchange with Bruno, briskly asking for calls as she hands him urgent notes on White House business. Bruno …
Amid the chaotic Communications Office, Donna intercepts a distracted Josh to probe the committee's jurisdiction over the shares hearings, initially guessing Judiciary. Josh reveals it's …
In the bustling Communications Office, Oliver sharply confronts C.J. for sabotaging the independent probe by manipulating the press and using Ainsley. Donna, piecing together the …
Amid the Roosevelt Room's whip count frenzy, Sam steps into the hallway to urgently pull Charlie aside, warning him that the House committee will offer …
In voice-over against the exterior of the House Oversight Committee Building, Majority Counsel Cliff Calley methodically explains the deposition process to Donna Moss, clarifying the …
In the Northwest Lobby, Leo warmly greets General Adamley with handshakes and banter about his Middle East trip, including jokes about an 'Aviation Prince' and …
In the Mural Room, Toby Ziegler confronts Congresswoman Tawny Cryer, who weaponizes examples of provocative, NEA-funded art—like chocolate-covered nudity and dung cheeseburgers—to justify the Appropriations …
In the White House Counsel's office, Oliver Babish methodically confronts First Lady Abbey Bartlet with her past malpractice suit over a fatal post-CABG infection and …
Chairman Bruno gavels the hearing back to order, signaling Rep. Gibson to resume his pointed questioning of Leo McGarry about October 30th in St. Louis—a …
In the Vice President's office, Hoynes urgently negotiates with Sam to rescue the stalled Internet Education Act, proposing cuts to rural internet funding or bill …
In the Roosevelt Room, Toby Ziegler, fueled by his relentless crusade for public access to political spectacle, sarcastically confronts media directors, accusing them of posturing …
In the Communications Office, Margaret and Donna preside over White House assistants, revealing the Washington Times' impending publication of leaked salary lists from congressional subcommittees, …
In Josh's office, Toby phones in to confirm Josh's deal appointing Brenda as Platform Committee Chairman to clinch the welfare bill vote, probing if his …
Josh parcels out two administrative tasks — the National Committee’s state-convention list and the DPC budget roll-outs — then slides into the familiar, teasing rhythm …
In the limousine Bartlet and Abbey trade intimate, teasing barbs about cancelling the inaugural parade — a small, comic contest that exposes Bartlet's stubborn pride …
In a cramped hotel suite the team reads a cascade of damaging local and national press — a compromising photograph, nitpicky local coverage, and attacks …
At a tense hotel-suite breakfast, Sam McGarry sits surrounded by White House aides as local press hits and campaign missteps are read aloud. A dispute …
Leo delivers bad news: the Chesapeake cleanup bill will not emerge from Committee, a casualty of partisan maneuvering and Deaver's objection to Landis's closeness with …