Oil Companies
Description
Event Involvements
Events with structured involvement data
Oil Companies defended by Hoynes against Toby's gouging charges, their additives costs, shutdown risks, and price volatility central to debate, framing them as regulatory victims in emissions crossfire.
Through Sluman's proxy testimony and policy arguments
Resisting White House regulatory pressure via economic leverage
Tests green agenda against industry pushback
Allies like Sluman advancing defensive front
Core dispute flashpoint—Toby blasts their 'outrageous markup' gouging despite additives costs, Hoynes counters with shutdown/fire vulnerabilities and scarcity logic, framing them as policy victims in emissions crossfire.
Through debated practices and Sluman's proxy testimony
Defended by Hoynes, skewered by Toby as predatory actors
Exposes green agenda's economic tensions, fueling antitrust scrutiny